Study of Multiple Physical Constraints on the Duflo-Zuker Nuclear Mass Model

Weihu YE; Yibin QIAN

doi:10.11804/NuclPhysRev.41.2023CNPC20

Volume 41 Issue 1

Mar. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Nuclear Physics Review > 2024 > 41(1): 269-275. > DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.41.2023CNPC20

Weihu YE, Yibin QIAN. Study of Multiple Physical Constraints on the Duflo-Zuker Nuclear Mass Model[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2024, 41(1): 269-275. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.41.2023CNPC20

Citation:

Weihu YE, Yibin QIAN. Study of Multiple Physical Constraints on the Duflo-Zuker Nuclear Mass Model[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2024, 41(1): 269-275. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.41.2023CNPC20

Citation:

Weihu YE, Yibin QIAN. Study of Multiple Physical Constraints on the Duflo-Zuker Nuclear Mass Model[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2024, 41(1): 269-275. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.41.2023CNPC20

PDF (5215 KB)

Study of Multiple Physical Constraints on the Duflo-Zuker Nuclear Mass Model

Weihu YE,
Yibin QIAN^,

Department of Applied Physics, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China

Funds: National Natural Science Foundation of China(12075121); Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (30922010312)

More Information

Corresponding author:
Yibin QIAN, E-mail: qyibin@njust.edu.cn
Received Date: June 28, 2023
Revised Date: November 09, 2023
Available Online: March 14, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Nuclear mass plays an important role in both nuclear physics and astrophysics. While the theoretical accuracy of masses has reached quite astonishing accuracy, their extrapolations have been conflicting, especially in neutron-rich regions. This paper reviews the main results of the extrapolations of nuclear mass models in recent years. By using a rigorous multi-objective optimization on mass models, we take the mass differences α decay energy and the Garvey-Kelson relations as multiple physical constraints to reduce the degree of overfitting phenomenon, resulting that the predictive power of models was improved in some degree. In addition, we use the improved mass data for the rapid neutron capture processes in nuclear astrophysics, further validating the reliability of the extrapolations.
- nuclear mass,
- α decay energy,
- multi-objective optimization,
- rapid neutron capture process

FullText(HTML)

References (52)

References

[1]	LUNNEY D, PEARSON J, THIBAULT C. Rev Mod Phys, 2003, 75(3): 1021. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.1021
[2]	LARSEN A C, SPYROU A, LIDDICK S N, et al. Prog Part Nucl Phys, 2019, 107: 69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.04.002
[3]	YAMAGUCHI T, KOURA H, LITVINOV Y A, et al. Prog Part Nucl Phys, 2021, 120: 103882. DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103882
[4]	ERLER J, BIRGE N, KORTELAINEN M, et al. Nature, 2012, 486(7404): 509. DOI: 10.1038/nature11188
[5]	何建军, 郭冰, 柳卫平, 等. 科学通报, 2018, 63(24): 2439. DOI: 10.1360/N972017-01368 HE Jianjun, GUO Bing, LIU Weiping, et al. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2018, 63(24): 2439. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.1360/N972017-01368
[6]	CHAI Q, QIANG Y, PEI J. Phys Rev C, 2022, 105: 034315. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.034315
[7]	DUFLO J, ZUKER A. Phys Rev C, 1995, 52: R23. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.52.R23
[8]	MÖLLER P, MYERS W D, SAGAWA H, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2012, 108(5): 052501. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.052501
[9]	SCHUETRUMPF B, REINHARD P G, STEVENSON P, et al. Comput Phys Commun, 2018, 229: 211. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.03.012
[10]	NEUFCOURT L, CAO Y, NAZAREWICZ W, et al. Phys Rev C, 2018, 98: 034318. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.034318
[11]	GARVEY G T, KELSON I. Phys Rev Lett, 1966, 16: 197. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.16.197
[12]	GARVEY G, GERACE W, JAFFE R, et al. Rev Mod Phys, 1969, 41(4): S1. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.41.S1
[13]	FU G, JIANG H, ZHAO Y, et al. Phys Rev C, 2010, 82: 034304. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.034304
[14]	JIANG H, FU G, SUN B, et al. Phys Rev C, 2012, 85: 054303. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.054303
[15]	DONG J, GU J, ZHANG Y, et al. Phys Rev C, 2019, 99: 014319. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.014319
[16]	DONG J, ZHANG Y, ZUO W, et al. Phys Rev C, 2018, 97: 021301. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.021301
[17]	BAO M, HE Z, LU Y, et al. Phys Rev C, 2013, 88: 064325. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064325
[18]	BAO M, HE Z, CHENG Y, et al. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 2017, 60: 1.
[19]	BAO M, LU Y, ZHAO Y, et al. Phys Rev C, 2016, 94: 044323. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.044323
[20]	ZONG Y, LIN M, BAO M, et al. Phys Rev C, 2019, 100: 054315. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054315
[21]	鲍曼, 姜慧, 赵玉民. 原子核物理评论, 2023, 40(2): 141. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.40.2022098 BAO Man, JIANG Hui, ZHAO Yumin. Nuclear Physics Review, 2023, 40(2): 141. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.40.2022098
[22]	NIU Z, LIANG H. Phys Lett B, 2018, 778: 48. DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.002
[23]	UTAMA R, PIEKAREWICZ J. Phys Rev C, 2017, 96: 044308. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044308
[24]	UTAMA R, PIEKAREWICZ J. Phys Rev C, 2018, 97: 014306. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.014306
[25]	NIU Z, FANG J, NIU Y, et al. Phys Rev C, 2019, 100: 054311. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054311
[26]	SHARMA A, GANDHI A, KUMAR A. Phys Rev C, 2022, 105: L031306. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L031306
[27]	MUMPOWER M R, SPROUSE T M, LOVELL A E, et al. Phys Rev C, 2022, 106: L021301. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.L021301
[28]	LOVELL A E, MOHAN A T, SPROUSE T M, et al. Phys Rev C, 2022, 106: 014305. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.014305
[29]	LI C Q, TONG C N, DU H J, et al. Phys Rev C, 2022, 105: 064306. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.064306
[30]	WU X, LU Y, ZHAO P. Phys Lett B, 2022, 834: 137394. DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137394
[31]	SOBICZEWSKI A, LITVINOV Y A. Phys Rev C, 2014, 90: 017302. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.017302
[32]	SOBICZEWSKI A, LITVINOV Y A. Phys Rev C, 2014, 89: 024311. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.024311
[33]	PASTORE A, NEILL D, POWELL H, et al. Phys Rev C, 2020, 101: 035804. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.035804
[34]	LIU M, WANG N, DENG Y, et al. Phys Rev C, 2011, 84: 014333. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.014333
[35]	GORIELY S, CHAMEL N, PEARSON J. Phys Rev C, 2010, 82: 035804. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.035804
[36]	GORIELY S, CHAMEL N, PEARSON J. Phys Rev C, 2013, 88: 024308. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.024308
[37]	MENDOZA-TEMIS J, HIRSCH J G, ZUKER A P. Nucl Phys A, 2010, 843(1-4): 14. DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.05.055
[38]	KIRSON M W. Nucl Phys A, 2012, 893: 27. DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2012.09.001
[39]	MARLER R T, ARORA J S. Struct Multidiscip Optim, 2004, 26(6): 369. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6
[40]	NGATCHOU P, ZAREI A, EL-SHARKAWI A. Pareto Multi Objective Optimization[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on, Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems. IEEE, 2005: 84.
[41]	TAPIA M G C, COELLO C A C. Applications of Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms in Economics and Finance: A Survey[C]//2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE, 2007: 532.
[42]	FORTIN F A, PARIZEAU M. Revisiting the Nsga-ii crowdingdistance Computation[C]//Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. 2013: 623.
[43]	DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, et al. IEEE Trans Evol Comput, 2002, 6(2): 182. DOI: 10.1109/4235.996017
[44]	WANG M, HUANG W, KONDEV F, et al. Chin Phys C, 2021, 45: 030003. DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf
[45]	BAREA J, FRANK A, HIRSCH J, et al. Phys Rev C, 2008, 77(4): 041304. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.041304
[46]	ORFORD R, VASSH N, CLARK J, et al. Phys Rev C, 2022, 105: L052802. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L052802
[47]	PORTER W, ASHRAFKHANI B, BERGMANN J, et al. Phys Rev C, 2022, 105: L041301. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L041301
[48]	LI H, NAIMI S, SPROUSE T, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2022, 128: 152701. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.152701
[49]	QIAN Y Z, WOOSLEY S. Astrophys J, 1996, 471: 331. DOI: 10.1086/177973
[50]	[EB/OL]. [2023-06-10] https://sourceforge.net/projects/nucnet-tools/.
[51]	[EB/OL]. [2023-06-10] https://reaclib.jinaweb.org/.
[52]	ARNOULD M, GORIELY S, TAKAHASHI K. Phys Rep, 2007, 450(4-6): 97. DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.06.002

[1]	Shengquan YAN. The Effect of Spin-parity Distribution in (n, γ) Cross Section Determination[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2024, 41(1): 366-370. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.41.2023CNPC32
[2]	Guangru LI, Wei JIANG, Lu ZHANG, Weiqiang CHEN, Qiang LI. Design of Beam Shaping Assembly for an Accelerator-based Multi-terminal BNCT Facility[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2021, 38(1): 80-88. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.38.2020051
[3]	Zhendong AN, Chenchen GUO. Precision Measurement Proposal of Neutron Capture Reaction in Ge Isotopes for s-/r-process and Neutrino-less Double-beta Decay Within Its Relevant Energy Range[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2020, 37(3): 643-649. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.37.2019CNPC71
[4]	S. Kubono, HE Jianjun, H. Yamaguchi, D. M. Kahl, S. Hayakawa, T. Terani, et al.. Neutron and Alpha Structure in Neutron Deficient Nuclei in Astrophysics[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2016, 33(2): 212-216. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.33.02.212
[5]	Application of Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization in the Design Optimization of Alternative Phase Focused DTL[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2015, 32(4): 415-420. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.32.04.415
[6]	WANG Mei, WEN Zhong-wei, LIN Ju-fang, JIANG Li, LIU Rong, WANG Da-lun. Study of Fission Fragment Trapping Detector Used in Neutron Detection[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2012, 29(2): 169-172. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.29.02.169
[7]	A.Umeya, T.Harada. Shell model Study of Neutron rich Λ-hypernucleus ¹⁰_ΛLi[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2009, 26(S1): 59-63. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.26.S1.059
[8]	YAN Sheng-quan. Surrogate Ratio Method to Determine Radioactive Nuclei Neutron Capture Cross Section in sprocess[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2009, 26(1): 23-26. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.26.01.023
[9]	SHI Shu-ting, LUO Xiao-bing#, WANG Lei. Measurement and MonteCarlo Correction of Neutron Radiative Capture Cross Section for ⁷⁵As[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2007, 24(1): 29-33. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.24.01.029
[10]	ZHANG Miao-jing, ZHANG Bo, LI Guang-lie. Nucleosynthesis of Elements in Evolution Processes of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2002, 19(3): 321-328. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.19.03.321

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (274) PDF downloads (44)

Study of Multiple Physical Constraints on the Duflo-Zuker Nuclear Mass Model

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Study of Multiple Physical Constraints on the Duflo-Zuker Nuclear Mass Model

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content