Advanced Search
LIN Hui, WU Yi-can, CHEN Yi-Xue. Investigation of Parameters Influencing on Simulation Precision and Speed of Monte Carlo MCNP Based on a Clinic Case[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2006, 23(2): 237-241. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.02.237
Citation: LIN Hui, WU Yi-can, CHEN Yi-Xue. Investigation of Parameters Influencing on Simulation Precision and Speed of Monte Carlo MCNP Based on a Clinic Case[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2006, 23(2): 237-241. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.02.237

Investigation of Parameters Influencing on Simulation Precision and Speed of Monte Carlo MCNP Based on a Clinic Case

More Information
  • Received Date: December 31, 1899
  • Revised Date: December 31, 1899
  • Monte its long simulation and photons, and investigated based Carlo method is regarded as the most accurate method for dose calculation at present, whereas time hinders its clinic application. The effects of the tally method, the cut-off energy of electrons the secondary electron number parameter ENUM on precision and speed of MCNP4c have been on a clinical case to seek for a relatively optimum calculation mode.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Qinghua ZHANG, Zhiqiang LIU, Dian GUO, Qiuning ZHANG, Ruifeng LIU, Changxu PEI, Jing WEN, Hongtao LUO, Shilong SUN, Chuan HUANG, Yingguo LI, Yongzhi YIN, Xiaohu WANG. In-beam PET Dose Monitoring Study of 12C Tumor Radiotherapy Based on TPS and Monte Carlo Calculation[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2022, 39(3): 359-366. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.39.2021069
    [2]DAI Tianyuan, LI Qiang, CHEN Weiqiang, LIU Xinguo, DAI Zhongying. Dependence of Relative Biological Effectiveness on Dose in Hypofractionated Carbon Ion Beam Radiotherapy[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(4): 784-789. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.04.784
    [3]WANG Yu, LI Gui, WANG Dong, WU Yi-can, FDS Team. Realization of 3D Evaluation Algorithm in Doseguided Radiotherapy[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2012, 29(3): 305-309. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.29.03.305
    [4]MCNP Dose Calculations in a CT Phantom for Therapeutic External Photon Beam[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2011, 28(2): 236-240. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.28.02.236
    [5]LI Min, GOU Cheng-jun, WU Zhang-wen, HOU Qing#. Request of Dose Calculation Method in Arc modulated Radiation Therapy[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2010, 27(2): 218-222. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.27.02.218
    [6]LAN Hai-yang, ZHENG Huaqing, LI Gui, #, . Improved Corrected Algorithm of Wedge Factors in Accuracy Radiotherapy[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2010, 27(1): 77-81. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.27.01.077
    [7]DUAN Xin, ZHANG Hong. Status and Advances of p53-Genetherapy and Radiotherapy in Malignant Tumer[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2006, 23(3): 326-330. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.03.326
    [8]ZHAO Pan, CHEN Yi-xue, LIN Hui, ZHENG Shan-liang, WU Yi-can. Effect of Different Voxel-uniting Methods on the Dose Calculation of MCNP/MCNPX[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2006, 23(2): 258-262. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.02.258
    [9]SONG Gang, LI Guo-li, WU Ai-dong, CHEN Yi-xue, WU Yi-can, KONG Ling-ling, TANG Hong, WANG Zhi. Verification of RBM Dose Engine in Experiment Using Emulational Head Phantom[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2006, 23(2): 246-249. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.02.246
    [10]DING Ai-ping, LI Ying, LU Lei, ZENG Qin, ZHENG Shan-liang, WU Yi-can. Visualizing Input Files of Neutronics Model for MCNP Calculation[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2006, 23(2): 130-133. DOI: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.02.130

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2850) PDF downloads (873) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return