QCD Phase Diagram in the Improved PNJL Model
-
摘要: Polyakov-Nambu-Jona-Lasinio(PNJL)模型是研究强相互作用物质性质的使用最为广泛的有效模型之一。在PNJL模型的基础上考虑了手征凝聚和Polyakov圈之间的纠缠作用,并且引入了化学势修正的Polyakov有效势,由此得到了化学势依赖的entangled PNJL(μEPNJL)模型。在平均场框架下的计算结果表明:相较于原始的PNJL模型,由μEPNJL模型计算得到的临界点(CEP)朝着温度更高、化学势更小处移动,并且手征对称性恢复相变和退禁闭相变在较大的化学势范围内都重合得很好。通过与STAR合作组在相对论重离子对撞机(RHIC)上进行的净质子数分布的测量结果相比,可以发现,通过适当的参数调节,由μEPNJL模型计算得到的CEP更加靠近实验预言的CEP可能存在的区域。
Polyakov-Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (PNJL) model is one of the most popular effective quark models to investigate the properties of strongly interacting matter. Based on the PNJL model, we consider the entanglement interactions between the chiral condensate and Polyakov-loop, as well as the chemical potential modification of Polyakov-loop potential simultaneously, which is named μEPNJL model. Compared with the original PNJL model, the calculations in the mean field approximation show that the critical end point (CEP) given in the μEPNJL model moves towards higher temperature and smaller chemical potential in the T-μ phase diagram. Besides, the chiral symmetry restoration and deconfinement phase transition coincide well in a wide range of chemical potential. Comparing our calculations with the measurement of the moments of net-proton multiplicity distributions at Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) by STAR Collaboration, we find that the CEP given by μEPNJL model can be closer to the range predicted by the experiment through appropriate parameter adjustment.Abstract: Polyakov-Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (PNJL) model is one of the most popular effective quark models to investigate the properties of strongly interacting matter. Based on the PNJL model, we consider the entanglement interactions between the chiral condensate and Polyakov-loop, as well as the chemical potential modification of Polyakov-loop potential simultaneously, which is named μEPNJL model. Compared with the original PNJL model, the calculations in the mean field approximation show that the critical end point (CEP) given in the μEPNJL model moves towards higher temperature and smaller chemical potential in the T-μ phase diagram. Besides, the chiral symmetry restoration and deconfinement phase transition coincide well in a wide range of chemical potential. Comparing our calculations with the measurement of the moments of net-proton multiplicity distributions at Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) by STAR Collaboration, we find that the CEP given by μEPNJL model can be closer to the range predicted by the experiment through appropriate parameter adjustment. -
[1] ADAMCZYK L, ADKINS J K, AGAKISHIEV G, et al. Physical Review Letters, 2014, 112(3):032302. [2] ODYNIEC G. Journal of Physics:Conference Series, 2013, 455(1):012037. [3] SCHAEFER B J. Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 2012, 75(6):741. [4] BORÁNYI S, FODOR Z, HOELBLING C, et al. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2010, 2010(9):1. [5] AOKI Y, BORSÁNYI S, DÜRR S, et al. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2009, 2009(06):088. [6] CHENG M, CHRIST N H, DATTA S, et al. Physical Review D, 2006, 74(5):054507. [7] HATSUDA T, KUNIHIRO T. Physics Letters B, 1984, 145(1):7. [8] REHBERG P, KLEVANSKY S P, HüFNER J. Physical Review C, 1996, 53(1):410. [9] FUKUSHIMA K. Physics Letters B, 2004, 591(3):277. [10] COSTA P, RUIVO M C, DE SOUSA C A, et al. Symmetry, 2010, 2(3):1338. [11] LOIZIDES C. The European Physical Journal C, 2007, 49(1):339. [12] SKOKOV V, FRIMAN B, REDLICH K. Physical Review C, 2011, 83(5):054904. [13] COLEMAN S, WITTEN E. Physical Review Letters, 1980, 45(2):100. [14] KARSCH F, LAERMANN E. Physical Review D, 1994, 50(11):6954. [15] KACZMAREK O, ZANTOW F. Physical Review D, 2005, 71(11):114510. [16] DE FORCRAND P, PHILIPSEN O. Nuclear Physics B, 2002, 642(1):290. [17] D' ELIA M, SANFILIPPO F. Physical Review D, 2009, 80(11):111501. [18] KOGUT J B, SINCLAIR D K. Physical Review D, 2004, 70(9):094501. [19] D' ELIA M, SANFILIPPO F. Physical Review D, 2009, 80(1):014502. [20] ROESSNER S, RATTI C, WEISE W. Physical Review D, 2007, 75(3):034007. [21] SHAO G Y, TANG Z D, DI TORO M, et al. Physical Review D, 2015, 92(11):114027. [22] SAKAI Y, SASAKI T, KOUNO H, et al. Physical Review D, 2010, 82(7):076003. [23] SCHAEFER B J, PAWLOWSKI J M, WAMBACH J. Physical Review D, 2007, 76(7):074023. [24] SHAO G Y, TANG Z D, DI TORO M, et al. Physical Review D, 2016, 94(1):014008. [25] FUKUSHIMA K. Physical Review D, 2008, 77(11):114028. [26] MCLERRAN L, PISARSKI R D. Nuclear Physics A, 2007, 796(1):83. [27] FUKUSHIMA K. Physical Review C, 2015, 91(4):044910. -
![WeChat](/fileYZHWLPL/journal/article/yzhwlpl/2017/3/PIC/wechat_cn_2367.jpg)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1465
- HTML全文浏览量: 139
- PDF下载量: 132
- 被引次数: 0