高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

2.76 TeV铅-铅碰撞中带电粒子的方位角分布

司瑞芳 刘福虎

司瑞芳, 刘福虎. 2.76 TeV铅-铅碰撞中带电粒子的方位角分布[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2015, 32(4): 392-397. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.32.04.392
引用本文: 司瑞芳, 刘福虎. 2.76 TeV铅-铅碰撞中带电粒子的方位角分布[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2015, 32(4): 392-397. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.32.04.392
SI Ruifang, LIU Fuhu. Azimuthal Distribution of Charged Particles in Pb-Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2015, 32(4): 392-397. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.32.04.392
Citation: SI Ruifang, LIU Fuhu. Azimuthal Distribution of Charged Particles in Pb-Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2015, 32(4): 392-397. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.32.04.392

2.76 TeV铅-铅碰撞中带电粒子的方位角分布

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.32.04.392
详细信息
    通讯作者: 司瑞芳

Azimuthal Distribution of Charged Particles in Pb-Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV

  • 摘要: 利用多源热模型分析了ATLAS实验组2.76 TeV 铅-铅碰撞中产生的、带电粒子在多个不同中心度事例中的方位角分布,并与n=2,4,6 和n=2 的傅里叶级数形式的方位角分布进行了比较。同时,利用由多源热模型得到的散射源在横动量空间的结构参数,计算了散射源在横动量空间的各向异性率和相对膨胀率,且与
    相关傅里叶系数进行了比较。在各个中心度区间,横动量空间的各向异性率和相对膨胀率都小于相应的傅里叶系数,椭圆各向异性是末态方位角分布中最主要的成分,其他成分的各向异性在各中心度区间的贡献不同且作用不可忽视。

    We analyze the azimuthal distributions of charged particles produced in 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisionsfrom ATLAS experimental group in eight different centralities by using the multi-source thermal model. Themodeling results are compared with the results from Fourier series forms with n = 2,4,6 and n = 2. Meanwhile,the anisotropy ratios and the relative expansion rates of scattering source in transverse momentum space are  calculated applying the transverse structural parameters of multi-source thermal model, and the modeling results are compared with the associated fourier coefficients. The anisotropy ratios and the relative expansion rates are less than the corresponding fourier coefficients in transverse momentum space in different center intervals. Elliptical anisotropy is main component in azimuthal distribution. Other anisotropies have different contributions in different centralities, and these contributions cannot be neglected.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1189
  • HTML全文浏览量:  152
  • PDF下载量:  203
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-03-31
  • 录用日期:  2015-12-20
  • 修回日期:  2015-08-09
  • 刊出日期:  2015-12-20

2.76 TeV铅-铅碰撞中带电粒子的方位角分布

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.32.04.392
    通讯作者: 司瑞芳

摘要: 利用多源热模型分析了ATLAS实验组2.76 TeV 铅-铅碰撞中产生的、带电粒子在多个不同中心度事例中的方位角分布,并与n=2,4,6 和n=2 的傅里叶级数形式的方位角分布进行了比较。同时,利用由多源热模型得到的散射源在横动量空间的结构参数,计算了散射源在横动量空间的各向异性率和相对膨胀率,且与
相关傅里叶系数进行了比较。在各个中心度区间,横动量空间的各向异性率和相对膨胀率都小于相应的傅里叶系数,椭圆各向异性是末态方位角分布中最主要的成分,其他成分的各向异性在各中心度区间的贡献不同且作用不可忽视。

We analyze the azimuthal distributions of charged particles produced in 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisionsfrom ATLAS experimental group in eight different centralities by using the multi-source thermal model. Themodeling results are compared with the results from Fourier series forms with n = 2,4,6 and n = 2. Meanwhile,the anisotropy ratios and the relative expansion rates of scattering source in transverse momentum space are  calculated applying the transverse structural parameters of multi-source thermal model, and the modeling results are compared with the associated fourier coefficients. The anisotropy ratios and the relative expansion rates are less than the corresponding fourier coefficients in transverse momentum space in different center intervals. Elliptical anisotropy is main component in azimuthal distribution. Other anisotropies have different contributions in different centralities, and these contributions cannot be neglected.

English Abstract

司瑞芳, 刘福虎. 2.76 TeV铅-铅碰撞中带电粒子的方位角分布[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2015, 32(4): 392-397. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.32.04.392
引用本文: 司瑞芳, 刘福虎. 2.76 TeV铅-铅碰撞中带电粒子的方位角分布[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2015, 32(4): 392-397. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.32.04.392
SI Ruifang, LIU Fuhu. Azimuthal Distribution of Charged Particles in Pb-Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2015, 32(4): 392-397. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.32.04.392
Citation: SI Ruifang, LIU Fuhu. Azimuthal Distribution of Charged Particles in Pb-Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2015, 32(4): 392-397. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.32.04.392

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回