高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

关于量子化学从头计算法及高斯98程序包计算结果的精度评述

赵振民

赵振民. 关于量子化学从头计算法及高斯98程序包计算结果的精度评述[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2006, 23(3): 331-334. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.03.331
引用本文: 赵振民. 关于量子化学从头计算法及高斯98程序包计算结果的精度评述[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2006, 23(3): 331-334. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.03.331
ZHAO Zhen-min. On Quantum Chemical ab Initio Method and Precision Evaluation of the Calculation Results by Gaussian98 Program[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2006, 23(3): 331-334. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.03.331
Citation: ZHAO Zhen-min. On Quantum Chemical ab Initio Method and Precision Evaluation of the Calculation Results by Gaussian98 Program[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2006, 23(3): 331-334. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.03.331

关于量子化学从头计算法及高斯98程序包计算结果的精度评述

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.03.331

On Quantum Chemical ab Initio Method and Precision Evaluation of the Calculation Results by Gaussian98 Program

  • 摘要: 利用Gaussian98程序HF,MP2和G2方法和除cc-pVQZ外基组对大量分子进行了几何优化和单点能计算,并将结果与实验数据进行了比较。The structure geometry and single point energy of small molecule are calculated by HF, MP2 and G2 methods and all base sets (except cc-pVQZ)available in Gaussian98 program software package. All these results are compared with the experimental data. It indicates that the molecule geometries optimized by G2 method in Gaussian98 are always in good accordance with experimental results, but the single point energy calculated by MP2 or G2 method differs some much from the experimental data. It is unsuitable to calculate the heat of formation through the single point energy of reactant calculated by methods and base sets provided by Gaussian98.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2440
  • HTML全文浏览量:  114
  • PDF下载量:  605
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  1900-01-01
  • 修回日期:  1900-01-01
  • 刊出日期:  2006-09-20

关于量子化学从头计算法及高斯98程序包计算结果的精度评述

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.03.331

摘要: 利用Gaussian98程序HF,MP2和G2方法和除cc-pVQZ外基组对大量分子进行了几何优化和单点能计算,并将结果与实验数据进行了比较。The structure geometry and single point energy of small molecule are calculated by HF, MP2 and G2 methods and all base sets (except cc-pVQZ)available in Gaussian98 program software package. All these results are compared with the experimental data. It indicates that the molecule geometries optimized by G2 method in Gaussian98 are always in good accordance with experimental results, but the single point energy calculated by MP2 or G2 method differs some much from the experimental data. It is unsuitable to calculate the heat of formation through the single point energy of reactant calculated by methods and base sets provided by Gaussian98.

English Abstract

赵振民. 关于量子化学从头计算法及高斯98程序包计算结果的精度评述[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2006, 23(3): 331-334. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.03.331
引用本文: 赵振民. 关于量子化学从头计算法及高斯98程序包计算结果的精度评述[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2006, 23(3): 331-334. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.03.331
ZHAO Zhen-min. On Quantum Chemical ab Initio Method and Precision Evaluation of the Calculation Results by Gaussian98 Program[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2006, 23(3): 331-334. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.03.331
Citation: ZHAO Zhen-min. On Quantum Chemical ab Initio Method and Precision Evaluation of the Calculation Results by Gaussian98 Program[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2006, 23(3): 331-334. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.23.03.331

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回