-
摘要: 本工作给出了对248Cf中
$2^{-}$ 带的理论分析。这条带在实验中被观测到自旋$25{\hbar}$ 和激发能高于4 MeV,因此该原子核在相应组态下裂变位垒至少持续到此角动量和激发能。就顺排性质和衰变特征对实验$2^{-}$ 带背后的物理机制进行了探讨。二准中子,二准质子以及非轴对称八极形变(基于反射不对称壳模型)内禀结构的不同假设通过电磁跃迁性质进行评估。结果显示,实验$2^{-}$ 带的谱学特性在粒子-声子混合图像下能得到较好的解释:准粒子阻碍了向基带的跃迁,非轴对称八极声子增大了旋称伙伴带的能级劈裂, 减弱了带间相互作用。该核低激发态展现的超导和正常相共存被尝试性地归因于中子152亚壳附近对相互作用的减弱。Abstract: An independent theoretical analysis is presented for the 2– band in 248Cf, which has been identified to spin$25{\hbar}$ and excitation energy$\geqslant$ 4 MeV, implying the fission barrier persists at least up to that angular momentum and excitation for the configuration. The underlying physics for the experimentally observed band is discussed in terms of alignment properties and decay pattern. Different scenarios for assumptions about intrinsic configuration are assessed with transition rates analysis. It turns out that only by invoking a particle-phonon mixing picture can the decay characteristics of the pair of bands be well accounted for, i.e. quasiparticle nature forbids decay to ground-state band, non-axial octupole phonon shifts the signature partners in energy and diminishes mutual interaction. The coexisting normal and superconducting phases are tentatively attributed to weak neutron pairing in the proximity of 152 deformed shell gap.-
Key words:
- shell-stabilization /
- high-spin /
- tetrahedral symmetry /
- particle-phonon mixing
-
Figure 1. (color online)Representative coincidence spectra for band 1 and 2, Cross-coincident transitions from projectile-like binary reaction partners are shown in the inset(from Ref. [23]).
Figure 2. (color online)Rotational model fit to experimental transition energies. Energies of the two lowest transitions are indicated in green dots. The inset shows reduced
$\chi^{2}$ of the fits as a function of the initial spin of first unambiguous transition (from Ref. [23]).Figure 3. (color online)Angular momentum alignment for ground-state and octupole band in 248Cf calculated using fitted Harris parameters(from Ref. [23]).
-
[1] SOBICZEWSKI A. Phys Part Nucl, 1994, 112, 162501: 119. [2] MÖLLER P, NIX J. J Phys G, 1994, 20: 1681. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/20/11/003 [3] SMOLANCZUK R, SKALSKI J, SOBICZEWSKI A, et al. Phys Rev C, 1995, 52: 1871. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.52.1871 [4] PATYK Z, SOBICZEWSKI A. Nucl Phys A, 1991, 533: 132. doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(91)90823-O [5] REITER P, KHOO T L, LISTER C J, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 1999, 82: 3. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.509 [6] LEPPÄNEN A, UUSITALO J, GREENLEES P T, et al. Eur Phys J A, 2006, 28: 301. doi: 10.1140/epja/i2006-10056-2 [7] BASTIN J, HERZBERG R D, BUTLER P A , et al. Phys Rev C, 2006, 73: 024308. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.024308 [8] ROBINSON A, KHOO T L, AHMAD I, et al. Phys Rev C, 2008, 78: 034308. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.034308 [9] GREENLEES P, HERZBERG R D,KETELHUT S, et al. Phys Rev C, 2008, 78: 021303(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.021303 [10] SULIGNANO B, THEISEN C, DELAROCHE J P, et al. Phys Rev C, 2012, 86: 044318. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.044318 [11] GREENLEES P, RUBERT J, PIOT J, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2012, 109: 012501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.012501 [12] PIOT J, GALL B J P, DORVAUX O, et al. Phys Rev C, 2012, 85: 041301(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.041301 [13] DAVID H, CHEN J, SEWERYNIAK D, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2015, 115: 132502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.132502 [14] KONKI J, SULIGNANO B, GREENLEES P T, et al. Phys Rev C, 2018, 97: 024306. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.024306 [15] REITER P, KHOO T L, AHMAD I, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 95: 032501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.032501 [16] CHATILLON A, THEISEN C, BOUCHEZ E, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2007, 98: 132503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.132503 [17] HERZBERG R, MOON S, EECKHAUDT S, et al. Eur Phys J A, 2009, 42: 333. doi: 10.1140/epja/i2009-10855-9 [18] KETELHUT S, GREENLEES P T, ACKERMANN D, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2009, 102: 212501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.212501 [19] RISSANEN J, CLARK R M, GREGORICH K E, et al. Phys Rev C, 2013, 88: 044313. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044313 [20] LI X, DUDEK J. Phys Rev C, 1994, 49: R1250(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.49.R1250 [21] DUDEK J, GOŹDŹ A, SCHUNCK N, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2002, 88(25): 252502-1. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.252502 [22] CHEN Y, SUN Y, GAO Z. Phys Rev C, 2008, 77: 061305(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.061305 [23] QIU Y. Single-Particle and Collective excitations in N ~ 150 Cm and Cf Nuclei[D]. Lowell: University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2016. [24] WU C S, CHENG L, LIN C Z, et al. Phys Rev C, 1992, 45: 2507. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.45.2507 [25] EECKHAUDT S. Spectroscopy in the Transfermium Region: Probing Rotational, Non-yrast and Isomeric Structures in 253, 254No[D]. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, 2006. [26] KETELHUT S. Rotational Structures and High-K Isomerism in 248, 250Fm[D]. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, 2010. [27] YATES S, CHASMAN R R, FRIEDMAN A M, et al. Phys Rev C, 1975, 12: 442. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.12.442 [28] AHMAD I, KONDEV F G, MOORE E F, et al. Phys Rev C, 2005, 71: 054305. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.71.054305 [29] VENKOVA T, GAST W, LIEDER R M, et al. Eur Phys J A, 2005, 26: 19. doi: 10.1140/epja/i2005-10132-1 [30] HINOHARA N. Phys Rev C, 2015, 92: 034321. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034321 [31] HINOHARA N, NAZAREWICZ W. Phys Rev Lett, 2016, 116: 152502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.152502
Investigation of Kπ=2– Band in 248Cf
doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.37.2019CNPC59
- 收稿日期: 2020-02-06
- 修回日期: 2020-05-12
- 网络出版日期: 2020-09-30
- 刊出日期: 2020-09-20
摘要: 本工作给出了对248Cf中
English Abstract
Investigation of Kπ=2– Band in 248Cf
- Received Date: 2020-02-06
- Rev Recd Date: 2020-05-12
- Available Online: 2020-09-30
- Publish Date: 2020-09-20
Abstract: An independent theoretical analysis is presented for the 2– band in 248Cf, which has been identified to spin
引用本文: | 邱远, 孙扬, 高早春. 248Cf 中Kπ=2–带的研究[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2020, 37(3): 569-573. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.37.2019CNPC59 |
Citation: | Yuan QIU, Yang SUN, Zaochun GAO. Investigation of Kπ=2– Band in 248Cf[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2020, 37(3): 569-573. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.37.2019CNPC59 |